![]() |
Aaron Swartz courtesy London Guardian |
Of increasing concern to the Internet
Generations has been the conflict between the rights of the individual and
protection of the public or communal good against the means and goals of
private enterprise (a wealthy few) to benefit from manipulation of the individual
and exploitation of public resources.
Far from being a new fad or youthful preoccupation, this is merely the
latest battle between privilege and the profit of the few against the common
rights and dignity of the individual and recognition of the shared access to
and interest in the common good. The
only difference between the Internet cultural conflicts of the early 21st
Century and struggles against religious oppression and royal prerogative in the
16th and 17th Centuries, and between the individual and
Big Business in the 19th and 20th Centuries is the public resource over which the battles
are being fought.
Reminiscent of former struggles against
Borgia Popes or against the censors of l’ancien
regime, the last two months have witnessed seemingly excessive efforts on
the part of United States Feds to exert the full might, power and authority of
their government against the lives and ideals of two rather ordinary young men on
behalf of American Big Business interests in the media, culture and formal
economy. These youth represent a sort of
Robin Hood versus the ‘Man’ in the complicated but lucrative world of the
modern Internet. Both stories have,
however, come to rather different conclusions – one malféant being forgiven and the other hopelessly determining to end
an extremely promising and rather gifted life in suicide.