ne Je'ren t(w)eschen twee Jrense
This essay is a purely brainstorming essay used to critic Seth Schwartz,
Marilyn Montgomery and Ervin Briones’ The
Role of Identity in Acculturation and Assimilation of Immigrant People. As
such, this is neither a scholarly essay nor submitted for classwork, discussion
or publication, rather just some amateur theoretical doodling mosty intended to
help process and develop other concepts for further development, review or
rejection. Danke.

As part of the assumptions set into their
thesis, Schwartz, Montgomery and Briones (collecting ‘The Authors), review
prominent Modern and Postmodern definitions of their key terms (excluding
‘immigrant’ which seems to be relatively accepted): Acculturation, cultural identity, culture,
Personal identity and Social identity.
They seemingly desire a more technocratic or applied theoretical tone
rather than a theory building perspective and preference for stability and
structure in these definitions, desiring that it be “possible to define acculturation and identity in terms precise enough
to support specific theoretical propositions, calls for empirical research, and
rationales for interventions to promote identity development in acculturating
individuals.” (p 2).
A short criticism is apparent immediately
in their assumptions that acculturating is a positive goal and that they, as
members of the dominant recipient culture, are in a position to and morally empowered
to intervene. Postmodernists should be
leaping up from chairs and rattling glasses in alarm.
While they slough off liability to
theoretical criticism against Postmodernism supplied by M. J. Chandler, and R.
Brubaker and F. Cooper in a manner that would make an American Congressperson
blush, they do have a point – but one that I think we can help mitigate.