![]() |
Spinoza courtesy samefacts.com |
Concepts of the intellect, the intellectual
and the anti-intellectual are very complicated.
Airey’s essay might not set us up to deal with these topics
properly.
We will first champion the new regard
recently opened to Evangelical intellectualism and then discuss the Evangelical
intellectual process (in Part 3).
Intellectually, Evangelicals have often
been their own worst enemies. While
thinking persons of faith have tended to be highly regarded in the 20th
Century, the traditions they represent have not (Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Simone
Weil, C. S. Lewis, Corrie ten Boom). In
Anglo-American culture, uncontested faith in an unchanging, personable God arguably
stalled with the publication of Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica, which opened the way for a secular
explanation of the universe sans God and thereby birthed the "godless"
Enlightenment. Faith as a living process
anchored by a rational God (including the basis of the Mennonite gemeinde) began to falter in 1914 with
the beginning hostilities in World War I and the horrors which followed. Arguably, the entire spectacle over the
Scopes’ Monkey Trials of the 1920s were symptomatic of these stumbles, and not
their cause. Soviet atheism did not
disprove God, but sought rather to replace God and inhabit (perhaps even
control) that realm of the transcendent.