Why Priests? A Failed Tradition
By
Garry Wills, 2013
Admitting that fiscal
limitations have limited my access to this book, I am stooping to a review of a
review of a book I have not read but understand to contain themes and subject
matter directly pertinent to the Mennonite experience and ideology.
First off, at 302 pages, Wills’
book does not sound like it will be an easy read. Two themes that come out from Randall Balmer’s
review in the New York Times Book Review section (17 Feb), are a contextual
criticism of the book of Hebrews and subsequently, a basic questioning of the
role and authority of the priesthood within the historic Roman Catholic church. Why
Priests? is hardly the first book to question the role and existence of the
Catholic priesthood, yet, Wills’ position as a bona-fide birth Catholic and a
former Jesuit seminarian should make his perspective intriguing to an the
Anabaptist audience which had largely moved on from such questions some five
hundred years ago.
Heirs of the Radical Reformation
will note Balmer’s indication that much of Wills’ argumentation easily recalls
that of Martin Luther circa 1520.
Basically, it seems that
Wills attacks the notion first of Christ as priest, preferring to locate Christ
more as a self-recognized and empowered prophet – a very different spiritual
and religious role. Wills seemingly
concludes that the concept of an elite, separated priesthood might in fact be
somewhat un-Christian, or at least un-Christ-like. Like Luther, and the Mennonites, he would
place such a role back into the position of the Radical Reformers, within the body
of believers and the individual Christian his or herself.
“Wills
argues that an alternative understanding of Jesus and the eucharist (sic), one
more consonant with the New Testament (Hebrews excepted) and informed by Augustine,
sees Jesus as coming to harmonize humanity with himself. The Eucharistic meal remains a meal (as it
was in the first century), not a sacrifice, one that celebrates the union
between Christ and his followers. “One
does nothing but disrupt this harmony by injecting superfluous intermediaries
between Jesus and his body of believers.”
Wills writes, “When these ‘representatives’ of Jesus to us, and of us to
Jesus, take the feudal forms of hierarchy and monarchy, of priests and papacy,
they affront the camaraderie of Jesus with his brothers.”
“…
[Wills] feels “no personal animosity toward priests,” nor does he expect the
priesthood to disappear. “I just want to
assure my fellow Catholics that, as priests shrink in numbers … congregations
do not have to feel they have lost all connection with the sacred just because
the role of priests in their lives is contracting… if the early followers of
Jesus had no need for priests,” Wills continues, neither do contemporary
believers. “If we need fellowship in
belief-and we do – we have each other,” he writes. Catholic believers can also find sustenance “in
the life of other churches.”
I will be searching out a
copy of Why Priests? by Garry Wills so
as to better understand how things have changed within the Catholic church and
the priesthood over the last five hundred years, and how contemporary Roman
Catholic believers might be encountering similar circumstances topics. Wills’ book might also be useful for
encouraging and fueling a more comprehensive dialogue between believers within
the Catholic church and the low church traditions. As such, it should be well worth the 302
pages read.
‘tag.